<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angular Momentum Disturbance Strength.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://landscheidt.auditblogs.com/2009/09/09/angular-momentum-disturbance-strength/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://landscheidt.auditblogs.com/2009/09/09/angular-momentum-disturbance-strength/</link>
	<description>A Cycles Based Approach to Understanding Solar Activity &#38; Climate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:58:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron de Haan</title>
		<link>http://landscheidt.auditblogs.com/2009/09/09/angular-momentum-disturbance-strength/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron de Haan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landscheidt.auditblogs.com/?p=365#comment-334</guid>
		<description>I know the C14 measurements are only reliable until 1945.

I also understand that it is a lot of work to generate future projection but I am convinced it&#039;s worth to make the effort.

I am looking forward to see the updated Angular Momentum Disturbance Strength Graph.

Keep up the good work.

&lt;strong&gt;REPLY:&lt;/strong&gt; Agree the updated AMDS graph could be of interest. I will get something going in the next few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the C14 measurements are only reliable until 1945.</p>
<p>I also understand that it is a lot of work to generate future projection but I am convinced it&#8217;s worth to make the effort.</p>
<p>I am looking forward to see the updated Angular Momentum Disturbance Strength Graph.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
<p><strong>REPLY:</strong> Agree the updated AMDS graph could be of interest. I will get something going in the next few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron de Haan</title>
		<link>http://landscheidt.auditblogs.com/2009/09/09/angular-momentum-disturbance-strength/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron de Haan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landscheidt.auditblogs.com/?p=365#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Geoff, is it possible that you make the graph up to date to 2009?

&lt;strong&gt;REPLY:&lt;/strong&gt; I am not sure if the proxy records can be extended, I know one of them is finished since we exploded nuclear weapons into our atmosphere. The sunspot records of course are far better but if a proxy could be continued it may still be worthwhile. As far as Angular Momentum Disturbance Strength is concerned I can extend that out for another 1000 years (might be a future project!). The next node on the graph would be 2010 which would score 4 points and convert to 15 derived SSN on Solanki&#039;s data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, is it possible that you make the graph up to date to 2009?</p>
<p><strong>REPLY:</strong> I am not sure if the proxy records can be extended, I know one of them is finished since we exploded nuclear weapons into our atmosphere. The sunspot records of course are far better but if a proxy could be continued it may still be worthwhile. As far as Angular Momentum Disturbance Strength is concerned I can extend that out for another 1000 years (might be a future project!). The next node on the graph would be 2010 which would score 4 points and convert to 15 derived SSN on Solanki&#8217;s data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
